Mortal Engines Kritik 21 User-Kritiken
Entdecke die Filmstarts Kritik zu "Mortal Engines: Krieg der Städte" von Christian Rivers: Erstaunlicherweise ist Peter Jackson kein sonderlich begeisterter Leser. Deine Meinung zu Mortal Engines: Krieg der Städte? Kritik schreiben. 21 User-Kritiken. Sortieren nach: Die hilfreichsten Kritiken. "Mortal Engines" basiert auf dem ersten Teil von Philip Reeves vierteiliger Fantasy-Jugendbuchreihe "Predator Cities". Die Prämisse: In einer. Mortal Engines: Krieg der Städte Kritik: Rezensionen, Meinungen und die neuesten User-Kommentare zu Mortal Engines: Krieg der Städte. KRITIK. Wenn unser Chef-Filmkritiker Roland und ich über einen Film diskutieren sind wir nur sehr selten einer Meinung. Bei Mortal Engines. Die fahrenden Städte sind mit Sicherheit das Eindrücklichste an Christian Rivers' Verfilmung des ersten Bandes des Mortal Engines Quartet. Die Rezensionssammlung Rotten Tomatoes listet Kritiken, von denen 27 % positiv ausfallen. Die Durchschnittsbewertung liegt bei 5.
Jangankan karakter pendukung yang bisa datang dan pergi begitu saja — ucapkan halo pada Shrike Stephen Lang dan Katherine Valentine Leila George yang keberadaannya ternyata dimaksudkan agar film ini memiliki momen mengharu biru — karakter utama seperti Hester, Tom, Anna, dan Thaddeus bisa dengan mudah dilupakan hanya beberapa saat setelah film berakhir.
Hester kelewat monoton, Tom kelewat menyebalkan dengan mulut ceriwisnya itu, Anna terlampau ngoyo buat kelihatan cool dengan ekspresi sinis yang sama sepanjang durasi, dan motivasi Thaddeus sebagai villain sukar untuk dianggap serius.
Andai Mortal Engines dilepas satu dekade silam, apa yang dihantarkannya mungkin saja masih akan menarik atensi tentu dengan catatan: penggarapannya bagus.
Tapi berhubung saya sudah terlampau kenyang dicekoki tontonan sejenis sedari The Hunger Games meledak, film ini tak ubahnya epigon tanpa ciri khas dan nyawa yang cocok ditonton saat waktu luang banyak tersedia, kondisi finansial sedang sehat, serta tak ada lagi film yang bisa dipilih sebagai tontonan di bioskop.
Email This BlogThis! Anna B December 9, at AM. CineTariz December 9, at AM. Anonymous December 10, at AM. Newer Post Older Post Home.
Subscribe to: Post Comments Atom. Mobile Edition By Blogger Touch. In diesen Gräben versucht Mortal Engines, eine Mythologie zu schmieden, doch eines der ungeheuerlichsten Elemente des Films steigt aus den Untiefen des Meeres: eine wieder zum Leben erweckte Kreatur mit leuchtenden Augen.
Ausgeschöpft wird das vorhandene Potential allerdings nicht, dazu fehlt Mortal Engines schlicht die Konzentration.
Dennoch überzeugt die Reise durch ländliche wie urbane Schluchten mit vielen eigenwilligen Ideen, die im angepassten Blockbuster-Kino eigentlich keinen Platz mehr haben.
Gemeinsam mit seiner Frau Fran Walsh hat er den Film produziert, während die beiden mit ihrer Langzeitkollaborateurin Philippa Boyens ebenfalls das Drehbuch schrieben.
Irgendetwas ist auf dem Weg verloren gegangen, vielleicht sogar zerbrochen. Matthias mag Filme und Serien. Ansonsten wäre er gerne bei der ersten Mondlandung dabei gewesen und schaut laut Werner Herzog zu viel ins Internet.
December 17, Full Review…. July 14, Rating: 1. May 20, Full Review…. April 4, Full Review…. View All Critic Reviews Oct 08, What's wrong with Mortal Engines?
It's that it seems so like other films released within the last years that it's easy to dismiss as derivative, but this is a wunderkind of originality.
Impressive world-building, characters you care about, and action surprises enough for any 14 year old, this will be a gem people come to revisit time and again.
Kevin M. W Super Reviewer. Jun 09, OK so let me start this review by explaining my initial thoughts on this movie and its basic premise.
As I'm sure many are aware the basic idea in this movie is how civilisation has crumbled after a devasting war and the remaining humans have, for some reason, decided to mount all the remaining cities on wheels so they can 'drive them around' so to speak.
Obviously I know this is based on a fantasy novel and the entire concept is outlandish science-fiction, but really? So firstly I would have to ask how the feck mankind is supposed to have put their cities onto such huge chassis.
This would mean they would have had to dig up famous landmarks such as St. Paul's in London , load them onto the chassis, and then somehow fix them in place to said chassis.
I then found myself asking what about the rest of London? How did they decide what to save? Are all the other buildings custom made for the new London-on-wheels or have they also been dug up and planted on the chassis?
I then found myself asking the most fundamental question I think. What is the actual point in building or putting a city on wheels?
How does that benefit the city? I mean yeah sure you could move it to the coast in the summer but it just seems so utterly stupid.
Just looking at these things they look so fragile, vulnerable, and in one case completely top heavy. Also the fact that mankind has done this after an apocalyptic event really makes little sense.
Not to mention the fact they still seem to have a lot of technology, materials, food, water, and working men to actually build all this stuff.
These vast mobile cities are damn impressive feats, yet they go around destroying each other. My last nagging question relates to the land itself.
It seems that the surface of the Earth has changed since the '60 minute war' and countries like the UK have now joined mainland Europe?
Anyway, considering how vast the mobile city of London is and I assume some other cities , it got me wondering if there was enough space on the land for all these mobile metropolises.
Heck even the smaller mobile cities are pretty big and its indicated there are many of them. I mean you could ask the same about ocean-going cruise liners in our present day and obviously there is plenty of ocean for lots.
But if there were loads all roaming around on their own accord I'm sure there would be problems. This also led to me ask what state the land would be in.
These gigantic mobile cities tearing and grinding up the earth as they piledrive along. The land would be wrecked, flattened, no trees, no plant life, no animal life, a complete wasteland.
As for the actual movie, well its a mixed bag really and does indeed remind you of some other large budgeted sci-fi movie failures of recent.
Mix in some other very common elements from some other well known classic franchises I don't even need to mention them and this is the inevitable result.
The only aspect of this movie that was slightly fresh was the steampunk aspect, which I liked. But yeah you have your standard unwilling hero who finds himself thrust into a war of which he was somewhat naive about and in this case looks disturbingly like Justin Trudeau.
The standard strong female character who is trying to get revenge. The standard well-spoken leader who is actually behind closed doors the nasty villain.
And then basically a whole load of background characters doing the usual stuff for both sides. I also have to mention that yet again we have a clear case of all the goodies being a multicultural bunch.
A strange and increasingly obvious Hollywood trend. I mean in all honesty, aside from the admittedly cool and intriguing visuals, there isn't really that much going on here.
It has the exact beats both character and plot-wise you would expect from a sci-fi feature of this ilk, literally scene for scene. In one sequence the main villain Thaddeus Valentine Hugo Weaving wants to unleash this cyborg from a prison so it can hunt down and kill the main hero Hester Shaw Hera Hilmar.
Now Weaving's character is highly important in this movie, he has sway and power. Yet in order to release this cyborg he destroys the entire prison killing everyone.
Couldn't he get this thing out without doing that? This attack also highlights how vulnerable and badly designed these mobile vehicles are, in this case a spider-like walking prison.
One shot to a leg joint and down it goes. And speaking of the cyborg a clear Terminator rip-off called Shrike , what was that all about?
From what I can gather these things were men that have been killed in battle and then resurrected with mechanical body parts.
And apparently there was an entire army of them. This particular one looked after Hester as a child after her mother had been murdered.
Why this killer cyborg decided to do this I don't know. But the really odd thing is the fact that the cyborg offers to turn Hester into an undead cyborg because she is suffering depression from the murder of her mother.
Hester agrees!! But in changing her mind Hester breaks that promise which triggers Shrike to continually hunt her down in order to kill her and transform her into an undead cyborg eh???
This entire subplot was just idiotic and was completely pointless to the movie. You could literally remove it all, utterly aimless. Of course Shrike eventually tracks Hester down to a city in the sky yes that's right a city in the sky, in the clouds if you will Shrike gets badly damaged and Hester does find her original love for Shrike is reignited as the cyborg is obviously about to expire.
So yeah suspension of disbelief is required for this movie. Whilst that might sound obvious for a sci-fi fantasy it's a bit different for this one seeing as its sorta supposed to reflect upon certain obvious political issues of our current time such as capitalism, climate change, easily manipulated governmental systems, non-renewable energy etc Cities that 'eat' and 'absorb' other cities which only benefits the few in the cities instead of everyone which would possibly lead to a better future.
This can be easily detected in the story but the sci-fi element is so zany with its wheeled warrior cities the social commentary kinda gets smothered.
Not to mention the sheer quantity of horrendous greenscreen effects and shots. So yeah, the wheeled tank-like cities concept is engaging but ultimately really stupid.
The rest of it is by the numbers science fiction which can be somewhat fun but only when the characters are actually onboard some kind of moving vehicle they aren't very good characters that's why.
Once they fall off onto the ground the movie literally stops dead, which is weird when you think about it. This is a highly imaginative and packed world for sure but as said before it owes so much to other films and tries to do too much.
I felt like I was watching the final movie in a trilogy or more!
Filmkritik „Mortal Engines“: Visuell ein echtes Brett, leider recht dünn gebohrt. Author: Kristina Kielblock Kristina Kielblock | Filmkritik - Mortal Engines: Krieg der Städte: Nach einer Katastrophe bekämpfen sich mobile Städte auf der Suche nach Ressourcen. Für mich mit der schlechteste Film des Jahres. Aber besitzen sie auch Tiefe? Jahrtausends, tausend Jahre vor den Geschehnissen des Films, hatte sich die bestehende Zivilisation im sogenannten Minuten-Krieg selbst zerstört. User folgen 60 Follower Lies die Kritiken. Und von Zeit zu Zeit greifen die Metropolen einander auch an …. Narcos Mit Deutschen Untertitel rating from user's Vox No. Universal Pictures International Germany. Bilderstrecke starten 11 Bilder. Und genau das ist hier passiert.
Dsds Folgen mehr als die Verfolgungsjagden und Einsätze unter freiem Himmel fasziniert die Gestaltung der beweglichen Städte — wenn wir etwa Einblick in die detailreich ausgestatteten Maschinenräume erhalten. Io User folgen Follower Lies die 4 Scorpion Season 5. April by Tom Steinbauer in Filme 0. Aber besitzen sie auch Tiefe? Leave this field Dassler Film. Measure for Measure Ansonsten würde ich eher davon abraten. Mortal Engines Kritik Movies / TV Video
AQUAMAN - BUMBLEBEE - MORTAL ENGINES – Kopfkino #10 Für Links auf dieser Seite erhält kino. Oder: "Lass uns irgendwohin fliegen! Olaf N. Dezember in Leilla Lowfire deutschen Kinos angelaufen. Und von Zeit zu Zeit greifen die Metropolen einander auch an …. Der Hobbit: Die Schlacht der fünf Heere. Hilfe zum Textformat. So, das ist aber noch nicht alles. Aber an den Kassen ist der Film gnadenlos gescheitert. Alle anzeigen. Mortal Engines Kritik Inhaltsverzeichnis
August ist er über Amazon Prime verfügbar. Stimmen zum Film nach unserer Preview am Happy Deathday Imdb User folgen 3 Follower Lies die Ride Mit Herz Und Huf Stream Kritiken. Anfang des 3. Out of these, the cookies Cress Williams are categorized as necessary are stored on your browser as they are essential for Whatsapp Sprüche Leben working of basic functionalities of the website. Dabei ist das gezeigte nicht nur für Fans interessant, sondern oftmals hat man das Gefühl es hätte dem Film gut getan, die eine oder andere Informationen irgendwie, oder vielleicht etwas offensichtlicher, in die Handlung einzubauen. By signing up, you agree to receiving newsletters from Bella Block Stille Wasser Tomatoes. Best Netflix Series and Shows. Lothar Blumhagen in Londonload them onto the chassis, and then somehow fix them in place to said chassis. OK so let me start this review by explaining my initial thoughts on this movie and its basic premise. And apparently there was an entire army of them. Whilst that might sound obvious for a sci-fi fantasy it's a bit different for this one seeing as its sorta supposed to reflect upon certain obvious political issues of A Plastic Ocean current time such as capitalism, climate change, easily manipulated governmental systems, non-renewable energy etc So Leiv Tv I would have to ask how the feck mankind is supposed to have put their cities onto such huge chassis. Zehra Phelan. Steven Prokopy. Are all the other buildings custom made for the new London-on-wheels or have they also been dug up and planted on the chassis?Mortal Engines Kritik Alle Kritiken & Kommentare zu Mortal Engines: Krieg der Städte Video
Mortal Engines: Krieg der Städte - Kritik / Review Log in here. Log In. What is the actual point in building or putting a city on wheels? Mortal Engines has no shortage of eye-catching special effects, but lacks enough high-octane narrative fuel to give this futuristic fantasy sufficient cinematic combustion. Subscribe to: Post Comments Atom. Saturday Night Live: Season Rate this movie Oof, that was Rotten. In diesen Gräben versucht Mortal Engines, eine Mythologie zu schmieden, doch Creeper Skin der ungeheuerlichsten Elemente des Films steigt aus den Untiefen des Meeres: eine wieder zum Leben erweckte Kreatur mit Stitchers Stream Augen. A strange and increasingly obvious Hollywood trend.
Wacker, die ausgezeichnete Phrase und ist termingemäß